The
Schools Trust: the Homestead
Act of 1862 and Public Education in Alaska
© 2003
by Niilo
Koponen
Much can
be heard recently about funding
cuts in the public school system in Alaska as the state budget is being
negotiatied between the governor and the Legislature. Niilo Koponen,
former
member of the Alaska House of Representatives, provides a little
historical
overview to the debate, and suggests an alternative source of funding.
Under the Morrill Act,
the Homestead Act of 1862,
Congress set aside Sections 16 and 36 of every township of federal land
granted to states and territories. This was to provide income (rents,
leases,
salesóat market value) with the money going into a trust to
provide school
funding. In territorial days the Legislature set up a "Permanent School
Fund" with the income from those sales and property leases. The same
was
done for the university and for the Mental Health Trust (one section
out
of every township). These were congressionally mandated funds.
Much of these
landsóespecially in Anchorageówere
leased by entrepreneurs at far below market value and subleased to
stores,
hospitals (Alaska Regional, formerly the Teamsterís Hospital)
and all sorts
of ventures. After statehood, agencies such as DOT took over the land
without
paying, arguing that it belonged to the state, so why pay. The
Anchorage
situation resulted in a lawsuit wherein the decisionówritten by
former
Chief Justice Jay Rabinowitzódecided that the property leased or
sold must
be paid for at full market value and that the money must go for public
education as directed by Congress.
The Anchorage
establishment blew its cork and started
a campaign to "put the property on the tax rolls." In 1977 and
í78 the
Legislature, pushed by Representative Ralph Meekins, Jr., (who in the
1981
session took over the Speakerís chair, thus sparking the "coup"
which led
to a Republican-led Legislature for more than a decade), reclassified
the
School, University, and Mental Health Trust lands as general state
public
lands. It also allowed municipalities to take ownership of 10% of state
public lands within municipal boundaries.
Anchorage did so (as did
other municipalities) and
passed an ordinance "selling" the parcels to the original lessor (not
the
sublessor who may have built the structure on it!) for the equivalent
of
two years under the market value rent! The properties were not offered
at auction or to any other purchasers! The property did go on the
Anchorage
tax rolls, but the property taxes were not set aside for school,
university,
or mental health purposes, but were used for whatever purpose the
borough
assembly wantedósuch as the Convention Center, etc.
The result in other
communities was that state agencies
such as DOT, Corrections, and Health and Social Services appropriated
the
lands, often before the municipalities acted to appropriate their full
share. When municipalities did so, they often took the lands for
establishing
or expanding needed municipal functions, although outlying areas often
were made available to private development.
The loss of income from
the Mental Health Trust lands
led to immediate lawsuits against the state. The University of Alaska
first
sued to reclaim the lands that the state had specifically transferred
from
the federally mandated University Land Trust. On February 27, 1981 the
Alaska Supreme Court found in favor of the university. Later the
university
sued for compensation or lands of equal value for other trust lands
taken
by the stateóincluding university lands given to municipalities.
The university
also won this suit.
The Mental Health lawsuit
was also won and led to
considerable political conflict in the Legislature over which agency
should
be compensated. The Mental Health Trust was established and eventually
given lands and funds to create a mental health system statewide.
However,
since the original congressional actóthe Alaska Mental Health
Enabling
Act, passed in 1956ógranted one million acres to be held in
public trust
to help create and operate mental health facilities throughout Alaska,
it was felt that this implied regionalization, rather than centralized
operation. This led to controversy among the supporters of the Mental
Health
Trust. The State of Alaska lost both that lawsuit and a less onerous
one
by the university system. Several school districts considered suing,
but,
afraid of political repercussions, decided against it.
The initial legislation
creating the territory of
Alaska did not include any provision for public education; Congress
apparently
assumed that the U.S. Office of Education would provide what was
needed.
Large, stable mining and fishing communities, having taxing powers,
took
it upon themselves to open schools for children of local families. In
the
next decade, Judge Wickersham, as Alaskaís delegate to Congress,
got Congress
to amend the Territorial Act to give the responsibility to the Alaska
Legislature
to oversee the creation and support of public schools; further,
Wickersham
got federal lands surveyed in settled parts of Alaska and extended the
Morrill Act provisions for the funding of public schools from sections
16 and 36 in such surveyed areas as the Tanana Valley (surveyed
1910-1916)
and throughout the "Railbelt" slightly later.
Following World War II
the influx of population into
the Territory created a stressful boom in school attendance. Dr. James
Ryan, former head of the teacher education department at the University
of Alaska, who had been appointed Commissioner of Education by Governor
Ernest Gruening, created the Permanent School Fund with the income from
the Morrill Act School Lands. He further lobbied Congress, which
created
a two-cent-per-package cigarette tax, which went to the Permanent
School
Fund.
The School Fund still
exists, but is far from adequate
and local property taxes support a large share of school costs. In
territorial
days, the territory (and tobacco taxes) paid the largest portion of
school
costs. Local "Independent School Districts" could tax themselves and
did
so to improve school quality and for locally needed programs. The state
constitution (and federal court decisions in other states) places the
responsibility
for public education directly on the state. In fact, Alaskaís
constitution
fixes the responsibility on the Legislatureówith restrictions,
stating:
"The Legislature shall by general law establish and maintain a system
of
public schools open to all children of the state, and may provide for
other
public educational institutions. Schools and institutions so
established
shall be free from sectarian control. No money shall be paid from
public
funds for the direct benefit of any religious or other private
educational
institution." (Article VII, Section 1). We should consider fully
funding
the school fund by reconstituting the public school land trust as has
been
done for the Mental Health Trust and/or giving the public school
fundóas
a trustóincome equal to the income from two sections of every
township
(including oil, mineral, gravel, and timber lands) of state
landsóincluding
reimbursement for the funds lost since the legislative action in 1978
before
some parents, property owners, or interested folks file a lawsuit that
will make the Mental Health suit look like a nickel and dime affair.
This
would largely alleviate the burden on municipal property taxpayers and
help solve the problem of funding schools in unorganized areas (those
without
municipal or borough infrastructure). In a case in the Lower 48 the
U.S.
Supreme Court ruled that the state could delegate, but not abrogate its
responsibilities for public education. Alaskaís own constitution
is even
more specific, fixing the responsibility squarely on the Legislature.
The proposal currently
mooted by the Administration,
to use the Permanent Fund to supplement the School Fund, is yet another
raid similar to the Legislatureís 1975 theft of Mental Health
Lands. Historically,
Congress intended that the income be provided from land income: be it
agricultural,
commercial, industrial, or mineralóincluding oil. The University
of Texas
endowment, probably the largest of any public university, is based on
the
profits of the oil lands that U.T. owns and leases out. Why
didnít we do
that with Prudhoe Bay for the public schools of Alaska, urban, rural,
or
suburban? Local taxes will never be sufficient. Children are not born
only
in wealthy communities (and even in those communities, adults often
find
other things they want to spend public monies on!). Read Article VII
Section
One of the Alaska State Constitution again. It is part of the
constitutional
job description of members of the Alaska Legislature.
©
2003 by Niilo
Koponen
|